IPKM/nmreval
15
2
Fork 1
Code Issues 40 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[BUG] Nicht-komplexe Fits von komplexen Funktionen #207

New Issue
Closed
opened 2024-01-09 16:27:16 +00:00 by elisa · 1 comment
elisa commented 2024-01-09 16:27:16 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

Current behavior

Beim export von agr werden alle sets doppelt exportiert: eines hat dann das label aber nur y-werte von 0 und das andere die tatsächlichen daten.. schicke das Beispiel-agr per telegram

Version

neuste, glaube ich

Expected behavior

No response

Steps to reproduce

No response

Log messages

No response

Anything else?

No response

### Current behavior Beim export von agr werden alle sets doppelt exportiert: eines hat dann das label aber nur y-werte von 0 und das andere die tatsächlichen daten.. schicke das Beispiel-agr per telegram ### Version neuste, glaube ich ### Expected behavior _No response_ ### Steps to reproduce _No response_ ### Log messages _No response_ ### Anything else? _No response_
elisa added the
Priority
Medium
Type/General
Kind/Bug
 labels 2024-01-09 16:27:16 +00:00
dominik was assigned by elisa 2024-01-09 16:27:16 +00:00
dominik changed title from [BUG] <Export von agr> to [BUG] Nicht-komplexe Fits von komplexen Funktionen 2024-01-09 16:31:36 +00:00
dominik commented 2024-01-09 16:38:10 +00:00
Member
Copy Link

Sieht aus wie ein Fit mit Dielektrikfunktion: Dann ist das Problem wahrscheinlich, dass die Fitkurve immer komplex ist, auch wenn nur Real- oder Imaginärteil gefittet werden. Und wenn alles angezeigt wird, wird auch alles exportiert

Sieht aus wie ein Fit mit Dielektrikfunktion: Dann ist das Problem wahrscheinlich, dass die Fitkurve immer komplex ist, auch wenn nur Real- oder Imaginärteil gefittet werden. Und wenn alles angezeigt wird, wird auch alles exportiert
dominik added
Type/Fit
 and removed
Type/General
 labels 2024-01-09 17:00:36 +00:00
dominik added this to the (deleted) milestone 2024-01-11 12:36:03 +00:00
dominik added this to the (deleted) project 2024-01-19 10:26:00 +00:00
dominik referenced this issue from a commit 2024-02-11 17:40:52 +00:00
207-noncomplex-fits (#244)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Kind/Breaking
Breaking change that won't be backward compatible
Kind/Bug
Something is not working
Kind/Crash
This issue describes unexpected shutdowns or non-responsive behaviors
Kind/Documentation
Improves documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Improve existing functionality
Kind/Feature
New feature
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical
Priority
High
The priority is high
Priority
Low
The priority is low
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium
Priority
Very low
The priority is very low
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid isssue
Reviewed/Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work
Status
On Hold
This issue or pull request is on hold
Status
Stale
Issues without activity for more than 6 months
Type/BDS
Issues connected to BDS
Type/DSC
Issues connected to DSC
Type/Fit
Issue is connected to fitting data
Type/General
issue connected to general functionality
Type/NMR
Issues connected to NMR
No Label
Kind/Bug
Priority
Medium
Type/Fit
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees dominik
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: IPKM/nmreval#207
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?