[BUG] Edit numerical-value RegEx when reading in multiple sets #276

New Issue

saeckech · 2024-06-28T06:51:10Z

saeckech commented

2024-06-28 06:51:10 +00:00

Current behavior

When reading in multiple sets and using the RegEx option to assign values, I noticed a case my expression did not cover. However, you cannot change the expression after reading in the first set.

Version

2024-06-24

Expected behavior

No response

Steps to reproduce

No response

Log messages

No related messages

Anything else?

value of the case outside the RegEx expression defaulted to zero.

datasets are named [...]TAU0p0001s.txt; [...]TAU7e-05s.txt; [...]TAU8p12345e-05s.txt
first RegEx "_TAU\dp?[e-]{0,2}\d+s" missed the last set. New RegEx "_TAU\dp?\d*[e-]{0,2}\d+s" works as expected.

### Current behavior When reading in multiple sets and using the RegEx option to assign values, I noticed a case my expression did not cover. However, you cannot change the expression after reading in the first set. ### Version 2024-06-24 ### Expected behavior _No response_ ### Steps to reproduce _No response_ ### Log messages ```shell No related messages ``` ### Anything else? value of the case outside the RegEx expression defaulted to zero. - datasets are named [...]TAU0p0001s.txt; [...]TAU7e-05s.txt; [...]TAU8p12345e-05s.txt - first RegEx "_TAU\dp?[e-]{0,2}\d+s" missed the last set. New RegEx "_TAU\dp?\d*[e-]{0,2}\d+s" works as expected.

saeckech added the

Kind/Bug

label 2024-06-28 06:51:10 +00:00

dominik commented

2024-06-28 07:35:57 +00:00

RegEx "_TAU\dp?[e-]{0,2}\d+s" cannot match your last entry. But this is your custom RegEx, so not my problem, the default one should be able to match.

dominik closed this issue

2024-06-28 07:35:57 +00:00

saeckech commented

2024-06-28 08:15:26 +00:00

Its not about the RegEx, but about being able to change it while multiple sets are queued for read-in.

saeckech reopened this issue

2024-06-28 08:15:26 +00:00

dominik commented

2024-06-28 09:08:42 +00:00

My misunderstanding then. But everything works as intended:

If "skip next dialogue" is not checked, I can change the regular expression between sets.
If it is checked, the same arguments are used for all files.

My misunderstanding then. But everything works as intended: - If "skip next dialogue" is not checked, I can change the regular expression between sets. - If it is checked, the same arguments are used for all files.

saeckech commented

2024-06-28 09:10:59 +00:00

" If "skip next dialogue" is not checked, I can change the regular expression between sets."
oddly, this I cannot

Correction: I was mistaken: the expression can be changed, the cursor position is simply not displayed when single-clicking into the field.
Addition to Correction: this seems to depend on whether the expression was edited for one of the previous sets

" If "skip next dialogue" is not checked, I can change the regular expression between sets." oddly, this I cannot Correction: I was mistaken: the expression can be changed, the cursor position is simply not displayed when single-clicking into the field. Addition to Correction: this seems to depend on whether the expression was edited for one of the previous sets

dominik closed this issue

2024-06-28 09:19:33 +00:00

saeckech commented

2024-06-28 09:23:48 +00:00

To reproduce:

during read in of the first set with RegEx "_TAU\dp?\d*[e-]{0,2}\d+s", mark any section of the RegEx, click OK
cursor is not displayed upon single-clicking into the RegEx field for the read-in of the second or subsequent sets.

To reproduce: 1. during read in of the first set with RegEx "_TAU\dp?\d*[e-]{0,2}\d+s", mark any section of the RegEx, click OK 2. cursor is not displayed upon single-clicking into the RegEx field for the read-in of the second or subsequent sets.

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Milestone

No project

No Assignees

2 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: IPKM/nmreval#276